Skip to content

Adjust vs Polyfill

Based on 20 and 7 real audits

MetricAdjustPolyfillWinner
Performance3653Polyfill
Accessibility8588Polyfill
Best Practices8796Polyfill
SEO8881Adjust
Security6469Polyfill
TTFB400ms46msPolyfill
Composite7378Polyfill
Performance
Adjust
36
Polyfill
53
Accessibility
Adjust
85
Polyfill
88
Security
Adjust
64
Polyfill
69
SEO
Adjust
88
Polyfill
81
Composite
Adjust
73
Polyfill
78

Polyfill outperforms Adjust in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 73). Adjust leads in SEO.

When to choose Adjust

Choose Adjust when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Polyfill

Choose Polyfill when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 20 audited Adjust sites and 7 audited Polyfill sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Adjust or Polyfill?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Polyfill sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (53 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, Adjust or Polyfill?
Polyfill sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Adjust or Polyfill?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Polyfill (88 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Adjust or Polyfill?
Adjust sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (88 vs 81 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Adjust or Polyfill?
Polyfill sites show lower Time to First Byte (46 ms vs 400 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Adjust or Polyfill for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Polyfill scores higher on overall composite score while Adjust may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback