Skip to content

Admitad vs DoubleClick Floodlight

Based on 1 and 596 real audits

View Admitad details | View DoubleClick Floodlight details
MetricAdmitadDoubleClick FloodlightWinner
Performance2732DoubleClick Floodlight
Accessibility8087DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices7781DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO8591DoubleClick Floodlight
Security6364DoubleClick Floodlight
TTFB107ms339msAdmitad
Composite7172DoubleClick Floodlight
Performance
Admitad
27
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Accessibility
Admitad
80
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Security
Admitad
63
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
SEO
Admitad
85
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Composite
Admitad
71
DoubleClick Floodlight
72

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms Admitad in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Admitad leads in TTFB.

When to choose Admitad

Choose Admitad when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Admitad sites and 596 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Admitad or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (32 vs 27 on average).
Which has better security, Admitad or DoubleClick Floodlight?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Admitad or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 80). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Admitad or DoubleClick Floodlight?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Admitad or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Admitad sites show lower Time to First Byte (107 ms vs 339 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Admitad or DoubleClick Floodlight for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DoubleClick Floodlight scores higher on overall composite score while Admitad may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback