Skip to content

Adobe Analytics vs core-js

Based on 171 and 1843 real audits

View Adobe Analytics details | View core-js details
MetricAdobe Analyticscore-jsWinner
Performance3336core-js
Accessibility8888Tie
Best Practices8485core-js
SEO8991core-js
Security6667core-js
TTFB340ms439msAdobe Analytics
Composite7274core-js
Performance
Adobe Analytics
33
core-js
36
Accessibility
Adobe Analytics
88
core-js
88
Security
Adobe Analytics
66
core-js
67
SEO
Adobe Analytics
89
core-js
91
Composite
Adobe Analytics
72
core-js
74

core-js outperforms Adobe Analytics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Adobe Analytics leads in TTFB.

When to choose Adobe Analytics

Choose Adobe Analytics when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 171 audited Adobe Analytics sites and 1843 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Adobe Analytics or core-js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, Adobe Analytics or core-js?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Adobe Analytics or core-js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Adobe Analytics (88 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Adobe Analytics or core-js?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Adobe Analytics or core-js?
Adobe Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (340 ms vs 439 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Adobe Analytics or core-js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while Adobe Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback