Based on 157 and 1405 real audits
| Metric | Adobe Analytics | Winner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 38 | |
| Accessibility | 88 | 89 | |
| Best Practices | 84 | 84 | Tie |
| SEO | 89 | 90 | |
| Security | 65 | 67 | |
| TTFB | 344ms | 281ms | |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Facebook outperforms Adobe Analytics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Adobe Analytics leads in no categories.
Adobe Analytics doesn't clearly lead Facebook in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Facebook when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 157 audited Adobe Analytics sites and 1405 audited Facebook sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback