Based on 159 and 2545 real audits
| Metric | Adobe Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 40 | Google Tag Manager |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 84 | 86 | Google Tag Manager |
| SEO | 89 | 91 | Google Tag Manager |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 344ms | 375ms | Adobe Analytics |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Google Tag Manager |
Google Tag Manager outperforms Adobe Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Adobe Analytics leads in TTFB.
Choose Adobe Analytics when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 159 audited Adobe Analytics sites and 2545 audited Google Tag Manager sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback