Based on 157 and 98 real audits
| Metric | Adobe Analytics | HubSpot Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 35 | HubSpot Analytics |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 84 | 80 | Adobe Analytics |
| SEO | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 344ms | 304ms | HubSpot Analytics |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | HubSpot Analytics |
HubSpot Analytics outperforms Adobe Analytics in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Adobe Analytics leads in best practices.
Choose Adobe Analytics when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HubSpot Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 157 audited Adobe Analytics sites and 98 audited HubSpot Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback