Based on 157 and 3 real audits
| Metric | Adobe Analytics | Oracle Infinity | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 50 | Oracle Infinity |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | Adobe Analytics |
| Best Practices | 84 | 88 | Oracle Infinity |
| SEO | 89 | 91 | Oracle Infinity |
| Security | 65 | 63 | Adobe Analytics |
| TTFB | 344ms | 527ms | Adobe Analytics |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Oracle Infinity |
Oracle Infinity outperforms Adobe Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Adobe Analytics leads in accessibility, security, TTFB.
Choose Adobe Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Oracle Infinity when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 157 audited Adobe Analytics sites and 3 audited Oracle Infinity sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback