Based on 159 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Adobe Analytics | Oracle Recommendations On Demand | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 49 | Oracle Recommendations On Demand |
| Accessibility | 88 | 80 | Adobe Analytics |
| Best Practices | 84 | 73 | Adobe Analytics |
| SEO | 89 | 83 | Adobe Analytics |
| Security | 65 | 60 | Adobe Analytics |
| TTFB | 344ms | 686ms | Adobe Analytics |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Adobe Analytics outperforms Oracle Recommendations On Demand in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Oracle Recommendations On Demand leads in performance.
Choose Adobe Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Oracle Recommendations On Demand when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 159 audited Adobe Analytics sites and 1 audited Oracle Recommendations On Demand sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback