Skip to content

Adobe Experience Manager vs core-js

Based on 159 and 1582 real audits

View Adobe Experience Manager details | View core-js details
MetricAdobe Experience Managercore-jsWinner
Performance3336core-js
Accessibility9088Adobe Experience Manager
Best Practices8484Tie
SEO8991core-js
Security6565Tie
TTFB366ms374msAdobe Experience Manager
Composite7272Tie
Performance
Adobe Experience Manager
33
core-js
36
Accessibility
Adobe Experience Manager
90
core-js
88
Security
Adobe Experience Manager
65
core-js
65
SEO
Adobe Experience Manager
89
core-js
91
Composite
Adobe Experience Manager
72
core-js
72

Adobe Experience Manager and core-js are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Adobe Experience Manager has a composite score of 72 while core-js scores 72.

When to choose Adobe Experience Manager

Choose Adobe Experience Manager when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 159 audited Adobe Experience Manager sites and 1582 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Adobe Experience Manager or core-js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, Adobe Experience Manager or core-js?
Adobe Experience Manager sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Adobe Experience Manager or core-js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Adobe Experience Manager (90 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Adobe Experience Manager or core-js?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Adobe Experience Manager or core-js?
Adobe Experience Manager sites show lower Time to First Byte (366 ms vs 374 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Adobe Experience Manager or core-js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while Adobe Experience Manager may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback