Skip to content

Adobe Experience Manager vs Microsoft

Based on 179 and 2523 real audits

View Adobe Experience Manager details | View Microsoft details
MetricAdobe Experience ManagerMicrosoftWinner
Performance3440Microsoft
Accessibility9089Adobe Experience Manager
Best Practices8486Microsoft
SEO8989Tie
Security6767Tie
TTFB352ms333msMicrosoft
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Adobe Experience Manager
34
Microsoft
40
Accessibility
Adobe Experience Manager
90
Microsoft
89
Security
Adobe Experience Manager
67
Microsoft
67
SEO
Adobe Experience Manager
89
Microsoft
89
Composite
Adobe Experience Manager
73
Microsoft
73

Microsoft outperforms Adobe Experience Manager in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Adobe Experience Manager leads in accessibility.

When to choose Adobe Experience Manager

Choose Adobe Experience Manager when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 179 audited Adobe Experience Manager sites and 2523 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Adobe Experience Manager or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (40 vs 34 on average).
Which has better security, Adobe Experience Manager or Microsoft?
Adobe Experience Manager sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Adobe Experience Manager or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Adobe Experience Manager (90 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Adobe Experience Manager or Microsoft?
Adobe Experience Manager sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Adobe Experience Manager or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (333 ms vs 352 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Adobe Experience Manager or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft scores higher on overall composite score while Adobe Experience Manager may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback