| Metric | Adobe Fonts | Duel | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 28 | Adobe Fonts |
| Accessibility | 88 | 93 | Duel |
| Best Practices | 85 | 96 | Duel |
| SEO | 92 | 100 | Duel |
| Security | 65 | 71 | Duel |
| TTFB | 314ms | 174ms | Duel |
| Composite | 73 | 75 | Duel |
Duel outperforms Adobe Fonts in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Adobe Fonts leads in performance.
Choose Adobe Fonts when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Duel when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 240 audited Adobe Fonts sites and 1 audited Duel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback