Based on 1 and 806 real audits
| Metric | Adobe Muse | Amazon Web Services | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 60 | 38 | Adobe Muse |
| Accessibility | 88 | 89 | Amazon Web Services |
| Best Practices | 77 | 87 | Amazon Web Services |
| SEO | 100 | 91 | Adobe Muse |
| Security | 59 | 66 | Amazon Web Services |
| TTFB | 283ms | 299ms | Adobe Muse |
| Composite | 70 | 72 | Amazon Web Services |
Amazon Web Services outperforms Adobe Muse in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). Adobe Muse leads in performance, SEO, TTFB.
Choose Adobe Muse when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Adobe Muse sites and 806 audited Amazon Web Services sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback