| Metric | Adobe Muse | Apache | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 60 | 50 | Adobe Muse |
| Accessibility | 88 | 87 | Adobe Muse |
| Best Practices | 77 | 88 | Apache |
| SEO | 100 | 90 | Adobe Muse |
| Security | 59 | 65 | Apache |
| TTFB | 283ms | 551ms | Adobe Muse |
| Composite | 70 | 73 | Apache |
Adobe Muse outperforms Apache in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (70 vs 73). Apache leads in best practices, security, composite score.
Choose Adobe Muse when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Apache when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Adobe Muse sites and 460 audited Apache sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback