| Metric | Adobe Muse | AWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 60 | 39 | Adobe Muse |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 77 | 87 | AWS |
| SEO | 100 | 91 | Adobe Muse |
| Security | 59 | 66 | AWS |
| TTFB | 283ms | 239ms | AWS |
| Composite | 70 | 72 | AWS |
AWS outperforms Adobe Muse in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). Adobe Muse leads in performance, SEO.
Choose Adobe Muse when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose AWS when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Adobe Muse sites and 420 audited AWS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback