Based on 1 and 180 real audits
| Metric | Adobe Portfolio | Emotion | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 33 | Adobe Portfolio |
| Accessibility | 71 | 90 | Emotion |
| Best Practices | 77 | 87 | Emotion |
| SEO | 100 | 92 | Adobe Portfolio |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 108ms | 251ms | Adobe Portfolio |
| Composite | 70 | 73 | Emotion |
Adobe Portfolio and Emotion are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Adobe Portfolio has a composite score of 70 while Emotion scores 73.
Choose Adobe Portfolio when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Emotion when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Adobe Portfolio sites and 180 audited Emotion sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback