Skip to content

Adobe Portfolio vs New Relic

Based on 1 and 177 real audits

View Adobe Portfolio details | View New Relic details
MetricAdobe PortfolioNew RelicWinner
Performance4135Adobe Portfolio
Accessibility7189New Relic
Best Practices7785New Relic
SEO10090Adobe Portfolio
Security6665Adobe Portfolio
TTFB108ms236msAdobe Portfolio
Composite7072New Relic
Performance
Adobe Portfolio
41
New Relic
35
Accessibility
Adobe Portfolio
71
New Relic
89
Security
Adobe Portfolio
66
New Relic
65
SEO
Adobe Portfolio
100
New Relic
90
Composite
Adobe Portfolio
70
New Relic
72

Adobe Portfolio outperforms New Relic in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (70 vs 72). New Relic leads in accessibility, best practices, composite score.

When to choose Adobe Portfolio

Choose Adobe Portfolio when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose New Relic

Choose New Relic when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Adobe Portfolio sites and 177 audited New Relic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Adobe Portfolio or New Relic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Adobe Portfolio sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Adobe Portfolio or New Relic?
Adobe Portfolio sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Adobe Portfolio or New Relic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor New Relic (89 vs 71). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Adobe Portfolio or New Relic?
Adobe Portfolio sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Adobe Portfolio or New Relic?
Adobe Portfolio sites show lower Time to First Byte (108 ms vs 236 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Adobe Portfolio or New Relic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Adobe Portfolio scores higher on overall composite score while Adobe Portfolio may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback