Skip to content

AdOcean vs Apache

Based on 1 and 460 real audits

View AdOcean details | View Apache details
MetricAdOceanApacheWinner
Performance2250Apache
Accessibility7687Apache
Best Practices8188Apache
SEO8590Apache
Security5865Apache
TTFB174ms551msAdOcean
Composite6973Apache
Performance
AdOcean
22
Apache
50
Accessibility
AdOcean
76
Apache
87
Security
AdOcean
58
Apache
65
SEO
AdOcean
85
Apache
90
Composite
AdOcean
69
Apache
73

Apache outperforms AdOcean in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 69). AdOcean leads in TTFB.

When to choose AdOcean

Choose AdOcean when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Apache

Choose Apache when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited AdOcean sites and 460 audited Apache sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AdOcean or Apache?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apache sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (50 vs 22 on average).
Which has better security, AdOcean or Apache?
Apache sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 58 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AdOcean or Apache?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Apache (87 vs 76). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AdOcean or Apache?
Apache sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AdOcean or Apache?
AdOcean sites show lower Time to First Byte (174 ms vs 551 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AdOcean or Apache for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apache scores higher on overall composite score while AdOcean may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback