Based on 1 and 93 real audits
| Metric | AdOcean | Facebook Login | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 22 | 37 | Facebook Login |
| Accessibility | 76 | 85 | Facebook Login |
| Best Practices | 81 | 84 | Facebook Login |
| SEO | 85 | 90 | Facebook Login |
| Security | 58 | 63 | Facebook Login |
| TTFB | 174ms | 460ms | AdOcean |
| Composite | 69 | 71 | Facebook Login |
Facebook Login outperforms AdOcean in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 69). AdOcean leads in TTFB.
Choose AdOcean when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Facebook Login when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited AdOcean sites and 93 audited Facebook Login sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback