Based on 4 and 253 real audits
| Metric | Adomik | Amazon Advertising | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 22 | 30 | Amazon Advertising |
| Accessibility | 85 | 87 | Amazon Advertising |
| Best Practices | 85 | 79 | Adomik |
| SEO | 88 | 91 | Amazon Advertising |
| Security | 59 | 64 | Amazon Advertising |
| TTFB | 418ms | 274ms | Amazon Advertising |
| Composite | 68 | 71 | Amazon Advertising |
Amazon Advertising outperforms Adomik in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 68). Adomik leads in best practices.
Choose Adomik when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Amazon Advertising when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 4 audited Adomik sites and 253 audited Amazon Advertising sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback