Skip to content

AdRoll vs AudioEye

Based on 22 and 1 real audits

MetricAdRollAudioEyeWinner
Performance2824AdRoll
Accessibility8887AdRoll
Best Practices7473AdRoll
SEO8585Tie
Security6660AdRoll
TTFB449ms905msAdRoll
Composite7268AdRoll
Performance
AdRoll
28
AudioEye
24
Accessibility
AdRoll
88
AudioEye
87
Security
AdRoll
66
AudioEye
60
SEO
AdRoll
85
AudioEye
85
Composite
AdRoll
72
AudioEye
68

AdRoll outperforms AudioEye in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 68). AudioEye leads in no categories.

When to choose AdRoll

Choose AdRoll when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose AudioEye

AudioEye doesn't clearly lead AdRoll in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 22 audited AdRoll sites and 1 audited AudioEye sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AdRoll or AudioEye?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AdRoll sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (28 vs 24 on average).
Which has better security, AdRoll or AudioEye?
AdRoll sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AdRoll or AudioEye?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AdRoll (88 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AdRoll or AudioEye?
AdRoll sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (85 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AdRoll or AudioEye?
AdRoll sites show lower Time to First Byte (449 ms vs 905 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AdRoll or AudioEye for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AdRoll scores higher on overall composite score while AdRoll may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback