Skip to content

AdRoll vs core-js

Based on 24 and 1747 real audits

MetricAdRollcore-jsWinner
Performance2937core-js
Accessibility8888Tie
Best Practices7685core-js
SEO8691core-js
Security6766AdRoll
TTFB437ms424mscore-js
Composite7373Tie
Performance
AdRoll
29
core-js
37
Accessibility
AdRoll
88
core-js
88
Security
AdRoll
67
core-js
66
SEO
AdRoll
86
core-js
91
Composite
AdRoll
73
core-js
73

core-js outperforms AdRoll in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). AdRoll leads in security.

When to choose AdRoll

Choose AdRoll when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 24 audited AdRoll sites and 1747 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AdRoll or core-js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (37 vs 29 on average).
Which has better security, AdRoll or core-js?
AdRoll sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AdRoll or core-js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AdRoll (88 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AdRoll or core-js?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 86 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AdRoll or core-js?
core-js sites show lower Time to First Byte (424 ms vs 437 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AdRoll or core-js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while AdRoll may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback