Based on 24 and 696 real audits
| Metric | AdRoll | Facebook SDK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 29 | 33 | Facebook SDK |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 76 | 80 | Facebook SDK |
| SEO | 86 | 91 | Facebook SDK |
| Security | 67 | 66 | AdRoll |
| TTFB | 437ms | 447ms | AdRoll |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | AdRoll |
AdRoll and Facebook SDK are closely matched, each leading in different categories. AdRoll has a composite score of 73 while Facebook SDK scores 72.
Choose AdRoll when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Facebook SDK when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 24 audited AdRoll sites and 696 audited Facebook SDK sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback