Based on 24 and 800 real audits
| Metric | AdRoll | Facebook SDK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 29 | 33 | Facebook SDK |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 76 | 81 | Facebook SDK |
| SEO | 86 | 92 | Facebook SDK |
| Security | 67 | 67 | Tie |
| TTFB | 437ms | 478ms | AdRoll |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Facebook SDK outperforms AdRoll in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). AdRoll leads in TTFB.
Choose AdRoll when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Facebook SDK when your primary concern is SEO and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 24 audited AdRoll sites and 800 audited Facebook SDK sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback