| Metric | AdScale | Apple Pay | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 31 | AdScale |
| Accessibility | 93 | 87 | AdScale |
| Best Practices | 100 | 83 | AdScale |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | AdScale |
| Security | 78 | 72 | AdScale |
| TTFB | 505ms | 292ms | Apple Pay |
| Composite | 83 | 74 | AdScale |
AdScale outperforms Apple Pay in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (83 vs 74). Apple Pay leads in TTFB.
Choose AdScale when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Apple Pay when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited AdScale sites and 53 audited Apple Pay sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback