| Metric | AdScale | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 37 | core-js |
| Accessibility | 93 | 88 | AdScale |
| Best Practices | 100 | 84 | AdScale |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | AdScale |
| Security | 78 | 66 | AdScale |
| TTFB | 505ms | 421ms | core-js |
| Composite | 83 | 73 | AdScale |
AdScale outperforms core-js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (83 vs 73). core-js leads in performance, TTFB.
Choose AdScale when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited AdScale sites and 1726 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback