Skip to content

AdThrive vs DoubleClick Floodlight

Based on 17 and 648 real audits

View AdThrive details | View DoubleClick Floodlight details
MetricAdThriveDoubleClick FloodlightWinner
Performance4033AdThrive
Accessibility8687DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices7782DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO9191Tie
Security6465DoubleClick Floodlight
TTFB251ms379msAdThrive
Composite7272Tie
Performance
AdThrive
40
DoubleClick Floodlight
33
Accessibility
AdThrive
86
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Security
AdThrive
64
DoubleClick Floodlight
65
SEO
AdThrive
91
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Composite
AdThrive
72
DoubleClick Floodlight
72

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms AdThrive in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). AdThrive leads in performance, TTFB.

When to choose AdThrive

Choose AdThrive when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 17 audited AdThrive sites and 648 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AdThrive or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AdThrive sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (40 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, AdThrive or DoubleClick Floodlight?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AdThrive or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AdThrive or DoubleClick Floodlight?
AdThrive sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AdThrive or DoubleClick Floodlight?
AdThrive sites show lower Time to First Byte (251 ms vs 379 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AdThrive or DoubleClick Floodlight for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AdThrive scores higher on overall composite score while AdThrive may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback