| Metric | AdThrive | Raptive | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 41 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 77 | 77 | Tie |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 63 | 63 | Tie |
| TTFB | 265ms | 265ms | Tie |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
AdThrive and Raptive are closely matched, each leading in different categories. AdThrive has a composite score of 72 while Raptive scores 72.
AdThrive doesn't clearly lead Raptive in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Raptive doesn't clearly lead AdThrive in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 16 audited AdThrive sites and 16 audited Raptive sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback