Skip to content

Advanced Custom Fields vs Yoast SEO

Based on 4 and 344 real audits

MetricAdvanced Custom FieldsYoast SEOWinner
Performance3347Yoast SEO
Accessibility8488Yoast SEO
Best Practices7888Yoast SEO
SEO8291Yoast SEO
Security6468Yoast SEO
TTFB615ms546msYoast SEO
Composite7376Yoast SEO
Performance
Advanced Custom Fields
33
Yoast SEO
47
Accessibility
Advanced Custom Fields
84
Yoast SEO
88
Security
Advanced Custom Fields
64
Yoast SEO
68
SEO
Advanced Custom Fields
82
Yoast SEO
91
Composite
Advanced Custom Fields
73
Yoast SEO
76

Yoast SEO outperforms Advanced Custom Fields in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Advanced Custom Fields leads in no categories.

When to choose Advanced Custom Fields

Advanced Custom Fields doesn't clearly lead Yoast SEO in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose Yoast SEO

Choose Yoast SEO when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 4 audited Advanced Custom Fields sites and 344 audited Yoast SEO sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Advanced Custom Fields or Yoast SEO?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Yoast SEO sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (47 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, Advanced Custom Fields or Yoast SEO?
Yoast SEO sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Advanced Custom Fields or Yoast SEO?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Yoast SEO (88 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Advanced Custom Fields or Yoast SEO?
Yoast SEO sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 82 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Advanced Custom Fields or Yoast SEO?
Yoast SEO sites show lower Time to First Byte (546 ms vs 615 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Advanced Custom Fields or Yoast SEO for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Yoast SEO scores higher on overall composite score while Advanced Custom Fields may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback