| Metric | Afterpay | Clarip | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 20 | 2 | Afterpay |
| Accessibility | 83 | 72 | Afterpay |
| Best Practices | 82 | 77 | Afterpay |
| SEO | 91 | 85 | Afterpay |
| Security | 69 | 70 | Clarip |
| TTFB | 240ms | 185ms | Clarip |
| Composite | 71 | 72 | Clarip |
Afterpay outperforms Clarip in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 72). Clarip leads in security, TTFB, composite score.
Choose Afterpay when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Clarip when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 11 audited Afterpay sites and 1 audited Clarip sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback