Based on 2 and 46 real audits
| Metric | Age Gate | Contact Form 7 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 29 | 46 | Contact Form 7 |
| Accessibility | 84 | 84 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 94 | 89 | Age Gate |
| SEO | 96 | 90 | Age Gate |
| Security | 58 | 66 | Contact Form 7 |
| TTFB | 2498ms | 781ms | Contact Form 7 |
| Composite | 71 | 75 | Contact Form 7 |
Contact Form 7 outperforms Age Gate in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 71). Age Gate leads in best practices, SEO.
Choose Age Gate when your primary concern is SEO and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Contact Form 7 when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Age Gate sites and 46 audited Contact Form 7 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback