Based on 4 and 4430 real audits
| Metric | Age Gate | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 51 | 49 | Age Gate |
| Accessibility | 83 | 89 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 93 | 89 | Age Gate |
| SEO | 96 | 93 | Age Gate |
| Security | 68 | 70 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 1541ms | 430ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 75 | 77 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms Age Gate in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). Age Gate leads in performance, best practices, SEO.
Choose Age Gate when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 4 audited Age Gate sites and 4430 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback