Skip to content

Agora vs Apollo

Based on 1 and 45 real audits

MetricAgoraApolloWinner
Performance2830Apollo
Accessibility9589Agora
Best Practices7385Apollo
SEO9293Apollo
Security7365Agora
TTFB113ms309msAgora
Composite7773Agora
Performance
Agora
28
Apollo
30
Accessibility
Agora
95
Apollo
89
Security
Agora
73
Apollo
65
SEO
Agora
92
Apollo
93
Composite
Agora
77
Apollo
73

Agora outperforms Apollo in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 73). Apollo leads in performance, best practices, SEO.

When to choose Agora

Choose Agora when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Apollo

Choose Apollo when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Agora sites and 45 audited Apollo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Agora or Apollo?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apollo sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (30 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, Agora or Apollo?
Agora sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Agora or Apollo?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Agora (95 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Agora or Apollo?
Apollo sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Agora or Apollo?
Agora sites show lower Time to First Byte (113 ms vs 309 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Agora or Apollo for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apollo scores higher on overall composite score while Agora may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback