| Metric | Ahoy | InstantClick | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 56 | 56 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 80 | 80 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 72 | 72 | Tie |
| TTFB | 40ms | 40ms | Tie |
| Composite | 77 | 77 | Tie |
Ahoy and InstantClick are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Ahoy has a composite score of 77 while InstantClick scores 77.
Ahoy doesn't clearly lead InstantClick in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
InstantClick doesn't clearly lead Ahoy in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Ahoy sites and 2 audited InstantClick sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback