Based on 37 and 2486 real audits
| Metric | Ahrefs | Google Tag Manager | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 40 | Google Tag Manager |
| Accessibility | 86 | 88 | Google Tag Manager |
| Best Practices | 88 | 86 | Ahrefs |
| SEO | 93 | 91 | Ahrefs |
| Security | 65 | 64 | Ahrefs |
| TTFB | 289ms | 370ms | Ahrefs |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Ahrefs |
Ahrefs outperforms Google Tag Manager in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Google Tag Manager leads in performance, accessibility.
Choose Ahrefs when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 37 audited Ahrefs sites and 2486 audited Google Tag Manager sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback