Skip to content

Ahrefs vs HTTP/3

Based on 46 and 2227 real audits

View Ahrefs details | View HTTP/3 details
MetricAhrefsHTTP/3Winner
Performance4457HTTP/3
Accessibility8690HTTP/3
Best Practices8990HTTP/3
SEO9492Ahrefs
Security6974HTTP/3
TTFB391ms401msAhrefs
Composite7679HTTP/3
Performance
Ahrefs
44
HTTP/3
57
Accessibility
Ahrefs
86
HTTP/3
90
Security
Ahrefs
69
HTTP/3
74
SEO
Ahrefs
94
HTTP/3
92
Composite
Ahrefs
76
HTTP/3
79

HTTP/3 outperforms Ahrefs in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 76). Ahrefs leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Ahrefs

Choose Ahrefs when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HTTP/3

Choose HTTP/3 when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 46 audited Ahrefs sites and 2227 audited HTTP/3 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Ahrefs or HTTP/3?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HTTP/3 sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (57 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, Ahrefs or HTTP/3?
HTTP/3 sites score higher on security analysis (74 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Ahrefs or HTTP/3?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HTTP/3 (90 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Ahrefs or HTTP/3?
Ahrefs sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Ahrefs or HTTP/3?
Ahrefs sites show lower Time to First Byte (391 ms vs 401 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Ahrefs or HTTP/3 for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HTTP/3 scores higher on overall composite score while Ahrefs may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback