Based on 36 and 2488 real audits
| Metric | Akamai Bot Manager | HSTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 48 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 87 | 89 | HSTS |
| Best Practices | 84 | 87 | HSTS |
| SEO | 86 | 91 | HSTS |
| Security | 62 | 69 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 947ms | 354ms | HSTS |
| Composite | 71 | 75 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms Akamai Bot Manager in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 71). Akamai Bot Manager leads in no categories.
Akamai Bot Manager doesn't clearly lead HSTS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 36 audited Akamai Bot Manager sites and 2488 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback