Skip to content

Akamai mPulse vs Google Analytics

Based on 124 and 1890 real audits

View Akamai mPulse details | View Google Analytics details
MetricAkamai mPulseGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance3341Google Analytics
Accessibility8987Akamai mPulse
Best Practices8185Google Analytics
SEO8991Google Analytics
Security6464Tie
TTFB459ms400msGoogle Analytics
Composite7173Google Analytics
Performance
Akamai mPulse
33
Google Analytics
41
Accessibility
Akamai mPulse
89
Google Analytics
87
Security
Akamai mPulse
64
Google Analytics
64
SEO
Akamai mPulse
89
Google Analytics
91
Composite
Akamai mPulse
71
Google Analytics
73

Google Analytics outperforms Akamai mPulse in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). Akamai mPulse leads in accessibility.

When to choose Akamai mPulse

Choose Akamai mPulse when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 124 audited Akamai mPulse sites and 1890 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Akamai mPulse or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, Akamai mPulse or Google Analytics?
Akamai mPulse sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Akamai mPulse or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Akamai mPulse (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Akamai mPulse or Google Analytics?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Akamai mPulse or Google Analytics?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (400 ms vs 459 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Akamai mPulse or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Akamai mPulse may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback