Based on 52 and 36 real audits
| Metric | Akamai | Akamai Bot Manager | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 35 | 33 | Akamai |
| Accessibility | 88 | 87 | Akamai |
| Best Practices | 84 | 84 | Tie |
| SEO | 87 | 86 | Akamai |
| Security | 63 | 62 | Akamai |
| TTFB | 814ms | 947ms | Akamai |
| Composite | 71 | 71 | Tie |
Akamai outperforms Akamai Bot Manager in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 71). Akamai Bot Manager leads in no categories.
Choose Akamai when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Akamai Bot Manager doesn't clearly lead Akamai in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 52 audited Akamai sites and 36 audited Akamai Bot Manager sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback