Skip to content

Akamai vs Akamai Web Application Protector

Based on 26 and 1 real audits

MetricAkamaiAkamai Web Application ProtectorWinner
Performance3537Akamai Web Application Protector
Accessibility8893Akamai Web Application Protector
Best Practices8896Akamai Web Application Protector
SEO8792Akamai Web Application Protector
Security6161Tie
TTFB1109ms1368msAkamai
Composite7174Akamai Web Application Protector
Performance
Akamai
35
Akamai Web Application Protector
37
Accessibility
Akamai
88
Akamai Web Application Protector
93
Security
Akamai
61
Akamai Web Application Protector
61
SEO
Akamai
87
Akamai Web Application Protector
92
Composite
Akamai
71
Akamai Web Application Protector
74

Akamai Web Application Protector outperforms Akamai in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 71). Akamai leads in TTFB.

FAQ

Which is faster, Akamai or Akamai Web Application Protector?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Akamai Web Application Protector sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (37 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Akamai or Akamai Web Application Protector?
Akamai sites score higher on security analysis (61 vs 61 on average).
Should I choose Akamai or Akamai Web Application Protector for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Akamai Web Application Protector scores higher on performance while Akamai may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback