Skip to content

Akamai vs Google Tag Manager

Based on 52 and 2547 real audits

View Akamai details | View Google Tag Manager details
MetricAkamaiGoogle Tag ManagerWinner
Performance3539Google Tag Manager
Accessibility8887Akamai
Best Practices8486Google Tag Manager
SEO8790Google Tag Manager
Security6365Google Tag Manager
TTFB814ms375msGoogle Tag Manager
Composite7173Google Tag Manager
Performance
Akamai
35
Google Tag Manager
39
Accessibility
Akamai
88
Google Tag Manager
87
Security
Akamai
63
Google Tag Manager
65
SEO
Akamai
87
Google Tag Manager
90
Composite
Akamai
71
Google Tag Manager
73

Google Tag Manager outperforms Akamai in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). Akamai leads in accessibility.

When to choose Akamai

Choose Akamai when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Tag Manager

Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 52 audited Akamai sites and 2547 audited Google Tag Manager sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Akamai or Google Tag Manager?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Tag Manager sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Akamai or Google Tag Manager?
Google Tag Manager sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Akamai or Google Tag Manager?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Akamai (88 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Akamai or Google Tag Manager?
Google Tag Manager sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Akamai or Google Tag Manager?
Google Tag Manager sites show lower Time to First Byte (375 ms vs 814 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Akamai or Google Tag Manager for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Tag Manager scores higher on overall composite score while Akamai may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback