Skip to content

Akamai vs Underscore.js

Based on 3 and 5 real audits

View Akamai details | View Underscore.js details
MetricAkamaiUnderscore.jsWinner
Performance2235Underscore.js
Accessibility8687Underscore.js
Best Practices8477Akamai
SEO8389Underscore.js
Security6366Underscore.js
TTFB187ms1225msAkamai
Composite6871Underscore.js
Performance
Akamai
22
Underscore.js
35
Accessibility
Akamai
86
Underscore.js
87
Security
Akamai
63
Underscore.js
66
SEO
Akamai
83
Underscore.js
89
Composite
Akamai
68
Underscore.js
71

Underscore.js outperforms Akamai in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 68). Akamai leads in best practices, TTFB.

FAQ

Which is faster, Akamai or Underscore.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Underscore.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (35 vs 22 on average).
Which has better security, Akamai or Underscore.js?
Underscore.js sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 63 on average).
Should I choose Akamai or Underscore.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Underscore.js scores higher on performance while Akamai may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback