Skip to content

Akamai Web Application Protector vs Microsoft

Based on 1 and 422 real audits

MetricAkamai Web Application ProtectorMicrosoftWinner
Performance3737Tie
Accessibility9389Akamai Web Application Protector
Best Practices9686Akamai Web Application Protector
SEO9290Akamai Web Application Protector
Security6167Microsoft
TTFB1368ms244msMicrosoft
Composite7472Akamai Web Application Protector
Performance
Akamai Web Application Protector
37
Microsoft
37
Accessibility
Akamai Web Application Protector
93
Microsoft
89
Security
Akamai Web Application Protector
61
Microsoft
67
SEO
Akamai Web Application Protector
92
Microsoft
90
Composite
Akamai Web Application Protector
74
Microsoft
72

Akamai Web Application Protector outperforms Microsoft in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Microsoft leads in security, TTFB.

FAQ

Which is faster, Akamai Web Application Protector or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Akamai Web Application Protector sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (37 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, Akamai Web Application Protector or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 61 on average).
Should I choose Akamai Web Application Protector or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Akamai Web Application Protector scores higher on performance while Akamai Web Application Protector may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback