Skip to content

Aklamio vs Apache

Based on 3 and 460 real audits

View Aklamio details | View Apache details
MetricAklamioApacheWinner
Performance4550Apache
Accessibility8587Apache
Best Practices9288Aklamio
SEO9490Aklamio
Security6665Aklamio
TTFB704ms551msApache
Composite7573Aklamio
Performance
Aklamio
45
Apache
50
Accessibility
Aklamio
85
Apache
87
Security
Aklamio
66
Apache
65
SEO
Aklamio
94
Apache
90
Composite
Aklamio
75
Apache
73

Aklamio outperforms Apache in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Apache leads in performance, accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Aklamio

Choose Aklamio when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Apache

Choose Apache when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3 audited Aklamio sites and 460 audited Apache sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Aklamio or Apache?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apache sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (50 vs 45 on average).
Which has better security, Aklamio or Apache?
Aklamio sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Aklamio or Apache?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Apache (87 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Aklamio or Apache?
Aklamio sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Aklamio or Apache?
Apache sites show lower Time to First Byte (551 ms vs 704 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Aklamio or Apache for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apache scores higher on overall composite score while Aklamio may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback