Based on 3 and 542 real audits
| Metric | Aklamio | Apache HTTP Server | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 51 | Apache HTTP Server |
| Accessibility | 85 | 86 | Apache HTTP Server |
| Best Practices | 92 | 88 | Aklamio |
| SEO | 94 | 90 | Aklamio |
| Security | 66 | 67 | Apache HTTP Server |
| TTFB | 704ms | 647ms | Apache HTTP Server |
| Composite | 75 | 74 | Aklamio |
Apache HTTP Server outperforms Aklamio in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 75). Aklamio leads in best practices, SEO, composite score.
Choose Aklamio when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Apache HTTP Server when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited Aklamio sites and 542 audited Apache HTTP Server sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback