Based on 3 and 731 real audits
| Metric | Aklamio | Cart Functionality | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 42 | Aklamio |
| Accessibility | 85 | 87 | Cart Functionality |
| Best Practices | 92 | 86 | Aklamio |
| SEO | 94 | 91 | Aklamio |
| Security | 66 | 70 | Cart Functionality |
| TTFB | 704ms | 469ms | Cart Functionality |
| Composite | 75 | 75 | Tie |
Aklamio and Cart Functionality are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Aklamio has a composite score of 75 while Cart Functionality scores 75.
Choose Aklamio when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Cart Functionality when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited Aklamio sites and 731 audited Cart Functionality sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback