Skip to content

Alexa Certified Site Metrics vs HSTS

Based on 3 and 3295 real audits

MetricAlexa Certified Site MetricsHSTSWinner
Performance3352HSTS
Accessibility6490HSTS
Best Practices8789HSTS
SEO9792Alexa Certified Site Metrics
Security7573Alexa Certified Site Metrics
TTFB422ms403msHSTS
Composite7778HSTS
Performance
Alexa Certified Site Metrics
33
HSTS
52
Accessibility
Alexa Certified Site Metrics
64
HSTS
90
Security
Alexa Certified Site Metrics
75
HSTS
73
SEO
Alexa Certified Site Metrics
97
HSTS
92
Composite
Alexa Certified Site Metrics
77
HSTS
78

HSTS outperforms Alexa Certified Site Metrics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 77). Alexa Certified Site Metrics leads in SEO, security.

When to choose Alexa Certified Site Metrics

Choose Alexa Certified Site Metrics when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3 audited Alexa Certified Site Metrics sites and 3295 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Alexa Certified Site Metrics or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, Alexa Certified Site Metrics or HSTS?
Alexa Certified Site Metrics sites score higher on security analysis (75 vs 73 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Alexa Certified Site Metrics or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 64). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Alexa Certified Site Metrics or HSTS?
Alexa Certified Site Metrics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (97 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Alexa Certified Site Metrics or HSTS?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (403 ms vs 422 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Alexa Certified Site Metrics or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Alexa Certified Site Metrics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback