Based on 17 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Algolia DocSearch | Hexo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 64 | 88 | Hexo |
| Accessibility | 90 | 62 | Algolia DocSearch |
| Best Practices | 95 | 100 | Hexo |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Hexo |
| Security | 61 | 63 | Hexo |
| TTFB | 477ms | 149ms | Hexo |
| Composite | 75 | 77 | Hexo |
Hexo outperforms Algolia DocSearch in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). Algolia DocSearch leads in accessibility.
Choose Algolia DocSearch when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Hexo when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 17 audited Algolia DocSearch sites and 1 audited Hexo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback