Based on 17 and 2556 real audits
| Metric | Algolia DocSearch | HSTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 64 | 49 | Algolia DocSearch |
| Accessibility | 90 | 89 | Algolia DocSearch |
| Best Practices | 95 | 88 | Algolia DocSearch |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 61 | 70 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 477ms | 364ms | HSTS |
| Composite | 75 | 75 | Tie |
Algolia DocSearch outperforms HSTS in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 75). HSTS leads in security, TTFB.
Choose Algolia DocSearch when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 17 audited Algolia DocSearch sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback