Based on 47 and 1989 real audits
| Metric | Algolia | Google Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 41 | Algolia |
| Accessibility | 88 | 87 | Algolia |
| Best Practices | 91 | 86 | Algolia |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 65 | Algolia |
| TTFB | 323ms | 425ms | Algolia |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Algolia |
Algolia outperforms Google Analytics in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in no categories.
Choose Algolia when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Google Analytics doesn't clearly lead Algolia in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 47 audited Algolia sites and 1989 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback