Based on 7 and 1905 real audits
| Metric | All in One SEO | Google Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 41 | All in One SEO |
| Accessibility | 88 | 87 | All in One SEO |
| Best Practices | 90 | 85 | All in One SEO |
| SEO | 97 | 91 | All in One SEO |
| Security | 64 | 64 | Tie |
| TTFB | 679ms | 401ms | Google Analytics |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | All in One SEO |
All in One SEO outperforms Google Analytics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in TTFB.
Choose All in One SEO when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 7 audited All in One SEO sites and 1905 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback