Skip to content

AlmaLinux vs Apache HTTP Server

Based on 2 and 461 real audits

MetricAlmaLinuxApache HTTP ServerWinner
Performance6250AlmaLinux
Accessibility7387Apache HTTP Server
Best Practices9688AlmaLinux
SEO8790Apache HTTP Server
Security6265Apache HTTP Server
TTFB626ms550msApache HTTP Server
Composite7173Apache HTTP Server
Performance
AlmaLinux
62
Apache HTTP Server
50
Accessibility
AlmaLinux
73
Apache HTTP Server
87
Security
AlmaLinux
62
Apache HTTP Server
65
SEO
AlmaLinux
87
Apache HTTP Server
90
Composite
AlmaLinux
71
Apache HTTP Server
73

Apache HTTP Server outperforms AlmaLinux in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). AlmaLinux leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose AlmaLinux

Choose AlmaLinux when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Apache HTTP Server

Choose Apache HTTP Server when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited AlmaLinux sites and 461 audited Apache HTTP Server sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AlmaLinux or Apache HTTP Server?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AlmaLinux sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (62 vs 50 on average).
Which has better security, AlmaLinux or Apache HTTP Server?
Apache HTTP Server sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AlmaLinux or Apache HTTP Server?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Apache HTTP Server (87 vs 73). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AlmaLinux or Apache HTTP Server?
Apache HTTP Server sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AlmaLinux or Apache HTTP Server?
Apache HTTP Server sites show lower Time to First Byte (550 ms vs 626 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AlmaLinux or Apache HTTP Server for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AlmaLinux scores higher on overall composite score while AlmaLinux may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback