Based on 2 and 461 real audits
| Metric | AlmaLinux | Apache HTTP Server | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 62 | 50 | AlmaLinux |
| Accessibility | 73 | 87 | Apache HTTP Server |
| Best Practices | 96 | 88 | AlmaLinux |
| SEO | 87 | 90 | Apache HTTP Server |
| Security | 62 | 65 | Apache HTTP Server |
| TTFB | 626ms | 550ms | Apache HTTP Server |
| Composite | 71 | 73 | Apache HTTP Server |
Apache HTTP Server outperforms AlmaLinux in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). AlmaLinux leads in performance, best practices.
Choose AlmaLinux when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Apache HTTP Server when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited AlmaLinux sites and 461 audited Apache HTTP Server sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback